Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Student Conduct results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 6,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,689 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Student Conduct is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Student Conduct
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,689
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos