Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Angling results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 1,253 hits. Analysis detected 7,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,277 of 16,562 topics). This Student Angling is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
Student Angling
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,544
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.2% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 22.6%22.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.7%13.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 22.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos