Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Rivas results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 1,253 hits . Analysis detected 7,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,208 of 6,628 authors). This Rebecca Rivas is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Rebecca Rivas
Author details
Total words: 5,544
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.8% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 22.6% 22.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 13.7% 13.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 22.6%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 10.9%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Personal Incredulity: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst