Topic summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video1,669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Street Vending Regulations results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 2,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,007 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (14,291 of 16,562 topics). This Street Vending Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Street Vending Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 5,007
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos