Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Streaming Wars results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 1,448 hits. Analysis detected 10,133 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,895 of 16,562 topics). This Streaming Wars is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Streaming Wars
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,420
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.5%19.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos