Topic summary
⁠19%1 analyzed article/video1,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Streaming Guide results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 665 hits. Analysis detected 1,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,054 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,669 of 16,562 topics). This Streaming Guide is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Streaming Guide
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,054
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 21.8%21.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Red Herring: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos