Topic summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 2,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strategy & Conflict results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , In-Group Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 809 hits . Analysis detected 7,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,206 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (10,099 of 16,562 topics). This Strategy & Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Strategy & Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 7,206
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst