Topic summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos1,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strategy results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,025 hits. Analysis detected 10,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,373 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,722 of 16,562 topics). This Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Strategy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,373
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos