Topic summary
⁠10%2 analyzed articles/videos143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Storm Damage results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 345 hits. Analysis detected 2,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,521 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,514 of 16,562 topics). This Storm Damage is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Storm Damage
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,521
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos