Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Storm results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Pessimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 260 hits. Analysis detected 918 faulty-reasoning hits from 666 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (791 of 16,562 topics). This Storm is worse (more manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Storm
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 666
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.2% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles666 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 25.8%25.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 39.0%39.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.6%12.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 39.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos