Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stigma results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 2,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,750 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,635 topics). This Stigma is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stigma
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,750
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.6%9.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos