Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stereotypes results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Ad Hominem, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,587 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,893 topics). This Stereotypes is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stereotypes
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Stereotypes (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 1,587
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.3%5.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Straw Man: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos