Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Statute Of Limitations results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 1,923 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,579 of 16,558 topics). This Statute Of Limitations is better (less manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Statute Of Limitations
Topic details
Total words: 2,480
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos