Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Vs Federal Power results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 887 faulty-reasoning hits from 978 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,962 of 16,558 topics). This State Vs Federal Power is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
State Vs Federal Power
Topic details
Total words: 978
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles978 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos