Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Investigation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 52.6% saturation with 1,093 hits. Analysis detected 7,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (708 of 15,265 topics). This State Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
State Investigation
Topic details
Total words: 2,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510095.4% percentile
13.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 52.6%52.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 40.5%40.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 22.1%22.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 44.3%44.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 21.9%21.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 15.8%15.8%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 13.5%13.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.8%14.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Topic 52.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 44.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 40.5%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos