Topic summary
⁠92%2 analyzed articles/videos1,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Federal Relations results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 945 hits. Analysis detected 5,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,293 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,029 of 16,562 topics). This State Federal Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
State Federal Relations
Topic details
Total words: 4,293
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510057.6% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.8%10.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.0%22.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.1%8.1%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos