Topic summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video1,888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Employees results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 658 hits. Analysis detected 3,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,943 of 16,562 topics). This State Employees is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
State Employees
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos