Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These State Capitol Exhibits results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 576 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This State Capitol Exhibits is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
State Capitol Exhibits
Topic details
Total words: 1,472
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.4%4.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos