Topic summary
87%2 analyzed articles/videos3,907 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Budgets results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,328 hits. Analysis detected 10,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,976 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (11,743 of 16,502 topics). This State Budgets is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
State Budgets
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,976
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos