Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Budget And Appropriations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 1,698 hits. Analysis detected 7,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,037 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,173 of 16,562 topics). This State Budget And Appropriations is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
State Budget And Appropriations
Topic details
Total words: 5,037
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 33.7%33.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 15.5%15.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.3%7.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 33.7%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos