Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Startup Competition results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 2,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,886 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Startup Competition is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Startup Competition
Topic details
Total words: 2,886
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.2%12.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos