Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Isabelle Johannessen results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Loss Aversion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 184 hits . Analysis detected 1,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,782 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Isabelle Johannessen is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Isabelle Johannessen
Author details
Total words: 1,782
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.7% 8.7% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 9.0% 9.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.7%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst