Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stand Up Comedy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 1,015 hits. Analysis detected 7,572 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,626 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,644 of 16,562 topics). This Stand Up Comedy is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Stand Up Comedy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,626
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.3%15.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.7%11.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos