Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stand Up results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 1,619 hits. Analysis detected 7,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (13,704 of 15,759 topics). This Stand Up is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Stand Up
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,576
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.9%16.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos