Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stalking results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 243 hits . Analysis detected 1,931 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,484 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,718 of 16,562 topics). This Stalking is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Stalking
Topic details
Total words: 2,484
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.2% 3.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst