Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Stadium Access results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 1,117 hits. Analysis detected 4,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,360 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,223 topics). This Stadium Access is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Stadium Access
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 10,360
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.4%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos