Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stabbing Attack results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 802 hits. Analysis detected 4,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,706 of 16,310 topics). This Stabbing Attack is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Stabbing Attack
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,224
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.9%18.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.2%5.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos