Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis New Music results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 2,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,703 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,047 of 15,878 topics). This St Louis New Music is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
St Louis New Music
Topic details
Total words: 2,703
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.1%9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos