Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis County Politics results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Red Herring, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 59.3% saturation with 550 hits. Analysis detected 2,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 927 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (872 of 16,562 topics). This St Louis County Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
St Louis County Politics
Topic details
Total words: 927
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.7% percentile
12.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles927 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 59.3%59.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 20.6%20.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 18.1%18.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 23.1%23.1%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Topic 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.5%6.5%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 59.3%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 6.9%Red Herring: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Tu Quoque: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 3.1%Special Pleading: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos