Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These St Louis County Executive Sam Page results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 619 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This St Louis County Executive Sam Page is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
St Louis County Executive Sam Page
Topic details
Total words: 1,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos