Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video393 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Board Of Aldermen results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 46.4% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 2,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,179 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (985 of 16,562 topics). This St Louis Board Of Aldermen is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
St Louis Board Of Aldermen
Topic details
Total words: 1,179
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510094.1% percentile
11.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 46.4%46.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 41.2%41.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.0%17.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 46.4%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Topic 41.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 6.9%Red Herring: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos