Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Squatting results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,378 hits. Analysis detected 9,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,878 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,242 of 16,562 topics). This Squatting is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Squatting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,878
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.3%15.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.5%15.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos