Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Spying results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 2,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Spying is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Spying
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Spying (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 4,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos