Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These SALLY ABOU ALJOUD results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Quote-first Misdirection, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 2,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This SALLY ABOU ALJOUD is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
SALLY ABOU ALJOUD
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%SALLY ABOU ALJOUD (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,020
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Special Pleading: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos