Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video257 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spring Crops results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Anecdotal, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 572 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,434 of 16,562 topics). This Spring Crops is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Spring Crops
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,028
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.2% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos