Topic summary
⁠62%4 analyzed articles/videos2,696 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Technology results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 784 hits. Analysis detected 8,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,028 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (13,372 of 16,562 topics). This Sports Technology is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Sports Technology
Topic details
Total words: 10,028
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos