Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Brandt results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 444 hits . Analysis detected 2,539 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of â 35% (4,315 of 6,628 authors). This David Brandt is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. David Brandt
Author details
Total words: 3,632
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.2% 12.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst