Topic summary
ā 85%1 analyzed article/video3,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Systems results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Indoctrination, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,191 hits. Analysis detected 9,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ā 36% (10,665 of 16,562 topics). This Sports Systems is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Sports Systems
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 36%Sports Systems (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 9,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos