Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,396 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports League Reforms results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 1,506 hits. Analysis detected 6,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,081 of 15,397 topics). This Sports League Reforms is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Sports League Reforms
Topic details
Total words: 5,584
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos