Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Governance results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 5,172 hits. Analysis detected 22,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,756 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,326 of 15,341 topics). This Sports Governance is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Sports Governance
Topic details
Total words: 13,756
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 37.6%37.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.9%15.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 37.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos