Topic summary
96% 3 analyzed articles/videos 558 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sports Broadcasting results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 1,332 hits . Analysis detected 7,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,614 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,917 of 16,472 topics). This Sports Broadcasting is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Sports Broadcasting
Topic details
Total words: 4,614
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 28.9% 28.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst