Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Martin Belam results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 985 hits . Analysis detected 3,973 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,689 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Martin Belam is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Martin Belam
Author details
Total words: 1,689
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 58.3% 58.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.7% 23.7% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 17.6% 17.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 9.8% 9.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 23.5% 23.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Author 58.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 23.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 12.7%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Author 9.8%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst