Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sponsorships results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 999 hits. Analysis detected 5,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,788 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (9,373 of 16,562 topics). This Sponsorships is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Sponsorships
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,788
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510043.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos