Topic summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Operations results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 576 hits. Analysis detected 3,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,489 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,842 of 16,562 topics). This Special Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Special Operations
Topic details
Total words: 3,489
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.5%16.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos