Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Special Events results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 936 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Special Events is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Special Events
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.3%13.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos