Topic summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos2,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Education Enrollment Trends results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,213 hits. Analysis detected 7,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,260 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (12,708 of 16,562 topics). This Special Education Enrollment Trends is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Special Education Enrollment Trends
Topic details
Total words: 10,260
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos