Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Speakers results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Begging the Question, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 70.5% saturation with 919 hits. Analysis detected 1,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,219 of 16,562 topics). This Speakers is worse (more manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group.
Speakers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.6% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 70.5%70.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.4%8.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 70.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos