Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Warfare results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Slippery Slope, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 1,298 hits. Analysis detected 8,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,711 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,129 of 16,562 topics). This Space Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Space Warfare
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,711
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.2% percentile
7.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 29.1%29.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.0%35.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 16.1%16.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 16.9%16.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 9.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 4.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos