Topic summary
⁠46%5 analyzed articles/videos1,239 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Technology results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,412 hits. Analysis detected 13,522 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,450 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,027 of 16,562 topics). This Space Technology is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Space Technology
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 14,450
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos