Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video639 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Space Business results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 40.1% saturation with 768 hits. Analysis detected 1,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,917 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 90% (1,804 of 16,562 topics). This Space Business is worse (more manipulative) than 89.10% of the peer group.
Space Business
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,917
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.1% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 40.1%40.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.1%13.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.5%7.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 40.1%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos